|
|
Keyword 
|
|
|
| dams
|
|
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1356.04.18 | Copy of a charter of 1356 issued by Count Willem V that authorized construction of and established maintenance responsibilities for the Gouwesluis at Alphen. |  |
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1443.03.13 | Declare that the measurements taken at Hazerswoude shall stand as authentic and be recorded in three books. |  |
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1448.10.08 | Permission for Gelderswoude to dig a new canal, 9 feet wide, on the north side of the Broekweg, running from the Kerklaan to the dam for the reservoir (boezemwater) of Zegwaard, to be inspected by the schout of Zoeterwoude along with the heemraden of Gelderswoude in the same manner as is done with other roads and canals. |  |
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1456.04.06 | Permission for Zoeterwoude to construct a dam in the canal that the residents of Stompwijk had made from the Brede weer on the Ommedijk because the residents of Zoeterwoude have suffered from too much water coming through the canal. |  |
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1462.10.09 | A few months earlier, permission had been granted to residents of the Blocklanden in Benthuizen to dig a new canal on the end of the Blocklanden, beginning on the Gelderswoudse canal through Allart Meeszoons dam and continuing to the road near Benthuizerhorn -- 8 feet wide, with specifications for any bridges, etc. But, because some now opposed it, two heemraden of Rijnland, Jacob van Woude and Jan van Poelgeest, went to have a look. and ordered, in the name of entire college of hoogheemraden, that Allart Meeszoon's dam be raised and provisioned with two hoofden 7 roeden feet apart at the expense of the schout and heemraden of Zegwaard, and the latter shall schouw the canal and road ditch. The old canal belonging to the Blocklanden shall be left un-schouwed. |  |
|
|
Keyword 
|
|
|
| death of heemraden
|
|
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1459.04.24 | Selection of a new hoogheemraad to replace one who died is made by the surviving hoogheemraden. The person chosen will pay for 32 masses at the monastery in Warmond for the soul of the one who died, as well as other expenses involved in memorializing their late colleague. |  |
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1459.04.24 | Selection of a new hoogheemraad, Jacob van der Woude, to replace the late Gerijt van Poelgeest. |  |
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1474.05.14 | Selection of a new hoogheemraad, Gerijt van Poelgeest, in place of the late Phillips van Wassenaer. |  |
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1478.04.23 | Selection of a new hoogheemraad, Jan van Scoten, in place of the late IJsbrant van Scoten. |  |
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1479.07.23 | Selection of a new hoogheemraad, Adriaen van Poelgeest, in place of the late Jan van Poelgeest, his father. |  |
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1481.06.26 | Selection of a new hoogheemraad, Adriaen van Zwieten, in place of Hughe van Zwieten, his nephew. |  |
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1482.06.16 | Selection of a new hoogheemraad, Gijsbrecht van Raphorst, in place of Dirc Boudijnszoon van Zwieten. |  |
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1482.12.01 | Selection of a new hoogheemraad, Thielman Oem van Wijngaerden, in place of Gerijt van Poelgeest. |  |
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1486.09.06 | Selection of a new hoogheemraad, Adriaen van der Does, in place of the late Adriaen van Zwieten. |  |
|
|
Keyword 
|
|
|
| dijkgraaf
|
|
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1394.04.26 | Confirmation by Duke Albrecht of an agreement between the dijkgraaf (and baljuw) and hoogheemraden of Rijnland and the free ambacht of Nieuwkoop concerning the drainage of Nieuwkoop at Spaarndam. Nieuwkoop will remain under the jurisdiction of Rijnland and may freely drain via the Spaarndam according to old practices because the old ruling concerning Nieuwkoop's earthworks at Zwammerdam remains in force. |  |
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1438.02.25 | Heemraden decide in favor of the dijkgraaf in a dispute with Alphen over the Doesschouw, unless the latter can offer additional proof. |  |
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1444.02.24 | Regularize the time and manner of collecting assessments in the ambachten of Rijnland. |  |
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1445.04.20 | Settlement of a dispute between former and previous heemraden of Woerden |  |
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1445.05.04 | Instructions on how to choose local heemraden. |  |
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1446.10.04 | Part of dispute between Rijnland and the cities of Leiden and Haarlem which involved, among other things, a certain Wernbout Janszoon reading out pronouncement in front of the city hall of Leiden after ringing the bells, as if he were a schout, telling the citizens of Leiden not to render morgengeld until the hoogheemraden first revealed their accounts to two members of the Council of Holland and to the cities of Haarlem and Leiden. Wernbout claimed he was authorized to do this by the Court of Holland. Rijnland's response was to fine Wernbout 10 lb. unless he could produce proof of his authorization, which he apparently could not. |  |
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1449.05.29 | Six men banned from Rijnland until they pay double the amount that the dijkgraaf put out on their behalf. |  |
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1453.02.25 | Written arguments that were part of longer processes involving Daem Janszoon and also Sasbout Aelwijnszoon against Vranc Jacobszoon and Eggert Vranckenszoon concerning levies and dues in Zegwaard. |  |
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1453.10.17 | Prohibit grazing of livestock along the Gouwekade in Alphen and the Oostkade in Hazerswoude. Livestock found on these dikes will be impounded (schutten). |  |
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1525.09.14 | Settlement of a dispute between the achterdorpen that drain into the IJssel and the commons of Rijnland over payment of levies and apportionment of maintenance responsibilities (verhoefslagen). |  |
|
|
Keyword 
|
|
|
| dikes
|
|
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1425.ca | Permission for the heemraden of Oegstgeest to inspect from Oegstgeesterkerk to Saelmonsberch and to issue rules/bylaws concerning the Hogedijk on the Rijwech to be brought to such width and height as is best and most useful for the common good subject to customary fines. Further, they shall inspect from the Oegstgeesterkerk to the Burchgravencamp of the Old Hoeve and establish an dike in the manner above. And this shall remain in effect until the heemraden rescind it. At the same time they are given consent to place posts on the dike to prevent passage if they wish. |  |
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1429.00.00 | The heemraden of Houtrijk order the rebuilding of the Schinkeldijk |  |
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1430.01.07 | Authorization for Spaarnwoude to build a sluis with associated canal through the dike (Hoge Zeedijk or Spaarndammerdijk) at Hofambacht with various stipulations, including a ban on fishing and a requirement that it be used only to discharge water and not to allow it in from outside. |  |
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1440.04.01 | Order the construction/reconstruction of the embankment between Zoeterwoude and the Zoetermeer. |  |
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1440.04.01 | Permission for Zegwaard and Zoetermeer to use a ditch as long as its kade is maintained at two spades high. |  |
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1440.10.04 | Permission for Leiderdorp to lease out their kadijk to three or four men who will reconstruct it as they see fit; those protected by it will pay the costs. |  |
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1442.12.20 | An official of Koudekerk explains that, with consent of the village lord, the schout, the majority of residents of Koudekerk, and the heemraaden of Rijnland, he has sold a kade for the benefit of Gnephoeck (Oudshoorn) for 35 Wilhelmusschilden which money he has laid out for the construction of a new kade at Koudekerk stretching from the Lagenwaardse dike en Ofwegen (Koudekerk). |  |
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1443.03.13 | Declare that the measurements taken at Hazerswoude shall stand as authentic and be recorded in three books. |  |
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1443.10.01 | Municipal officials of Haarlem and Leiden complained in front of the governor of Holland, lord of Lalaing, about Rijnland's attempts to collect levies from the cities despite their charters which they claim exempt them from such payments. Rijnland countered with charters claiming such authority and also referred, at the very end, to a similar case with Amsterdam in which, presumably Rijnland's claims were upheld. |  |
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1447.10.03 | Regulate responsibility for and maintenance of a dike and ditch that ran from the Rijndijk into the ambacht of Wassenaar, with warnings against breaching the dike (presumably for ease of water transport). |  |
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1470.06.27 | Permission to build a dike in Alphen, from the Oostkade (Hazerswoude) to the Gouwe kade, with two 'naecte sluijsen' (sluices without bridges) and a canal (Watergang der Vier Ambachten) along the dike. |  |
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1523.11.10 | Settlement of dispute between residents of Alphen west of the Gouwe and village officials of the south end of Waddinxveen and Coenencoop concerning the Binnenkade and the overtocht (inclined plane with winch to lift a boat over a dike) of the Goudkade to the Nesse, alongside the culvert. |  |
|
|
Keyword 
|
|
|
| diking
|
|
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1437.09.03 | Heemraden order that Ghijsbrecht Jansz. be paid one white penny per roed for diking his share along the Halmeer and also for dirt. |  |
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1447.00.00 | Settlement of a dispute concerning payment for dirt used in dike repair. |  |
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1449.11.18 | Probit the removal of dirt set aside for raising the Spaarndam or for other hydraulic matters without indicating so to the hhraden or one of their assistants. |  |
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1452.11.21 | Hoogheemraden agree to summon witnesses to a hearing (dagvaarden) at Haarlem on 15 January 1453 to collect information and issue orders concerning how the breaches in the dike between Spaarndam and Amsterdam are to be closed. |  |
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1452.11.24 | Because there were more breaches in the dikes near the Carthusian monastery and on the east side of the city, the hoogheemraden believed it necessary for those having authority for hydraulic mattes there to join Rijnland in common cause to close the breaches. Therefore they requested that the dijkgraaf of Rijnland, Aelbrecht van Raephorst, with the aldermen (schepenen) of Diemen and the schout and of Amstelveen (collectively the predecessors to Amstelland water board) to attend a hearing planned for 15 January 1453 at Haarlem. |  |
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1453.01.15 | At a hearing at Haarlem on Monday, 15 January, the hoogheemraden ordered the closing of all dike breaches, both east and west of Amsterdam, as soon as possible, all at the same time, to be coordinated with the trustees of the water board Amstelland. An appended note said the work was to begin on the following Sunday |  |
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1453.01.15 | In the presence of the representatives of the villages between Amsterdam and Spaarndam, the hoogheemraden ordered the closing of all dikes along the Spaarndammerdijk, with the costs to be spread over the affected villages in proportion to their areas. |  |
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1453.01.15 | Residents of all villages along the Spaarndammerdijk, between Spaarndam and Amsterdam, must appear at the dike on 8 February to have their prescribed maintenance work in closing the dike breaks assigned to them. |  |
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1453.01.15 | Permission to the Carthusians of Amsterdam to close a breach in the dike near their monastery with dirt from their own lands without help from others. By agreement of the ambachten, the Carthusians are exempt this time from having to contribute to dike work elsewhere. No legal precedent (recht) will be established in this decision. |  |
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1453.01.15 | Permission for Spaarnwoude, Hofambacht, and Houtrijk, because of their remote location and difficulty for others to get there, to close the waal at Houtrijk by themselves, without the others usually responsible for maintenance there. Sloten and Osdorp allowed the same for walen in their territories. They must not stop work until it is competed. Because it will be difficult for the poor to meet their obligations, the hoogheemraden have generously give 70 gulden (of 10 plaken-worth), half to go to Spaarnwoude, Hofambacht, and Houtrijk, and half to Sloten and Osdorp. |  |
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1453.01.15 | Hoogheemraden decide that Willem van Alcmade and Jan van Poelgeest will keep an accounting of all the expenses incurred in the repair and reconstruction of the Zeedijk. Later, these costs will be spread proportionally over all of Rijnland. |  |
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1477.12.29 | Request that Amsterdam, Diemen, and Weesp consult with Rijnland on possibilities for coordinated action against dike breaks both north and east of Amsterdam. |  |
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1477.12.29 | All residents between Spaarndam and Amsterdam are ordered to appear at their sections of the Zeedijk (Spaarndammerdijk) on 8 January to receive their assignments in dike repair and remain there until dismissed. |  |
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1477.12.29 | Sloten to close waal at Pieter Cillen's wharf, Osdorp to close the waal at Gerijn Bruynen, and Spaarnwoude, Houtrijk, and Hofambacht to close the waal in Houtrijk behind Gogenct. They will do this without help from others because of the difficulty getting there. |  |
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1477.12.29 | To close the walen, one man will appear for every 20 made of land, and every two men with a schuit, and each shall be properly equipped with spades, barrows, etc. as is necessary. The date to appear is 8 January. |  |
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1477.12.29 | Because the hoogheemraden realize that the poor will have greatest difficulty in performing the repair work needed to close all walen, the former will help pay for excessive costs. |  |
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1477.12.29 | All expenses that hoogheemraden incur while closing the walen in the Zeedijk will be distributed across the entire territory of Rijnland. |  |
|
|
Keyword 
|
|
|
| dispute settlement
|
|
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1385.04.01 | A certified copy, made 3 January 1437, by Dirc van Wassenaar of a charter first issued in 1385 (original says 1384, but the court of Holland normally began the new year around Easter). The original charter regulated some differences between Hazerswoude and Leiden concerning jurisdiction over lands in Hazerswoude owned by Leidenaars, among other things. |  |
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1415.03.19 | Dispute settlement between Rijnland and Schieland concerning penninggeld collected in Alphen, Hasertswoude, Waddinxveen, and Boskoop concerning a waterway on the west side of the Gouwe that drained via a sluice into the IJssel. |  |
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1433.00.00 | An investigation into a dispute between Rijnland and the city of Amsterdam whose merchants had breached the Overtoom (an overtocht or inclined plane with winch to lift a boat over a dike) in the Kostverloren wetering on the southwestern side of the city to facilitate the transport of some bags of wool. Both sides claimed to own the dike in question and each appealed to old charters granting them jurisdiction. In the end, the arbitrators sided with Rijnland. |  |
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1437.06.25 | Settlement of dispute between Gerijt van Heemstede, lord of Benthuizen, and Willem Bort concerning a waterway in Hogeveen that had been authorized by a charter from Duke Albrecht. Those who do not contribute their share of maintenance responsibilities shall have their drainage blocked off. |  |
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1437.ca | Testimony and a decision in a dispute between Tielman van Buschusen and the ambacht of Zoeterwoude concening whether or not Zoeterwoude had paid Tielman the amount to be collected but which was never turned over to the clerk of Rijnland. Because a credible witness sided with Zoeterwoude, so did the hoogheemraden. |  |
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1437.ca | Testomony and a decision in a dispute between Tielman van Buschusen and the ambacht of Leiderdorp concening whether or not Leiderdorp had paid Tielman the amount to be collected but which was never turned over to the clerk of Rijnland. Because the witness sided with Tielman, do did the hoogheemraden, though Leiderdorp could appeal the decision with new evidence within eight days. |  |
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1438.02.25 | Heemraden decide in favor of the dijkgraaf in a dispute with Alphen over the Doesschouw, unless the latter can offer additional proof. |  |
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1443.10.01 | Municipal officials of Haarlem and Leiden complained in front of the governor of Holland, lord of Lalaing, about Rijnland's attempts to collect levies from the cities despite their charters which they claim exempt them from such payments. Rijnland countered with charters claiming such authority and also referred, at the very end, to a similar case with Amsterdam in which, presumably Rijnland's claims were upheld. |  |
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1445.04.20 | Settlement of a dispute between former and previous heemraden of Woerden |  |
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1446.06.28 | In the dispute between Willem Bartoen (on behalf of residents of Voorhout) and Albert Nagel (schout of Voorhout), Albert must henceforth choose village officials in consultation with (met inspraak van) the residents of Voorhout, as is done in other ambachten and concerning which a keur is in effect. |  |
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1446.06.28 | Take testimony in a dispute between the residents of Alphen and those of Randenburg, Groenswaard, and Snijdelwijk concerning maintenance requirements in the Gouwesluis at Alphen, with a copy of an old charter from 1284 brought into play |  |
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1446.10.04 | Some decisions in a long-standing dispute between the small villages along the Gouwe and Alphen concerning the maintenance of the Gouwe sluice at Alphen. It was put in order in this year as described, and it was concluded that, for the moment, this is probably the best way to continue doing it. |  |
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1448.06.25 | Verdict in the dispute between Vechter Clasezoon, an official of Zoeterwoude, and the burgemeesters of Leiden concerning the assessment of 50 morgens of land that was taken up within the city walls. The hoogheemraden sided with Leiden because, by Vechter's admission, no assessments had been collected on this land for over 50 years, and the rule in place says that if morgengeld is not collected for a third of 100 years, the right to assess the land is forfeited. |  |
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1448.06.25 | Decision in the dispute between Alphen and the smaldorpen (small villages: Groenswaard, Boskoop, Snijdelwijk, and Randenburg) concerning the maintenance of the Gouwesluis in which Alphen is found in the wrong, in the light of a earlier finding made in 1446. |  |
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1450.06.30 | Settlement of a dispute between Poelien, Groenswaard, and Snijdelwijk, plaintiffs, against Alphen and Boskoop, defendents, concerning maintenance of the Poelienwatering. The canal, near Gouda, has remained useless and uninspected since the war, and the plaintiffs want the old rules (costumen) to be reinstated and enforced. Alphen, referring to old charters, claimed the right to block outside water from entering their waterschap, but the plaintiffs maintained on the basis of the same charters that according to common law they have a right to drain their land as with all other land within the borders of Rijnland -- plaintiffs, after all, contribute to Rijnland's works. The hoogheemraden sided with the plaintiffs -- latter may drain the area 170 morgen large (measured by Ghijstgen the surveyor, and they must make put an embankment around the upper veen to prevent water from it flowing into the area authorized to drain through the canal in question. |  |
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1451.06.29 | Order the baliuw of Hazerswoude to summon the opponents of keeping the Dirc Doedenwatering open to come forward with a verklaring (legal argument) of why they oppose the measure. |  |
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1455.07.01 | Verdict in a long-running dispute between Willem van Oestgeest and his companions and the officials of Oegstgeest concerning morgengeld, penninggeld, and more; the hoogheemraden side with the officials of Oegstgeest. |  |
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1457.06.28 | This is the verdict in a dispute between Aven Jan Bonens widow and Florijs Aelbertszoon concerning a verhoefslag (apportionment of maintenance responsibilities) for the dike at Houtrijk. |  |
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1460.04.20 | This document comes from the Hoogheemraadschap van Schieland -- gives the residents of Waddinxveen above the Backwatering (i.e., Zuid Waddinxveen) permission to drain via the Alphen wetering (canal from the Oude Rijn to the IJssel at Gouda). |  |
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1469.02.28 | Settlement of dispute between residents of Hogeveen concerning maintenance of the Kijfvairte. The canal must be put in order by all residing between the Westvaart and the geordineerde Oostvaart (Hazerswoude) beginning at the northern streckvaart to the fens (venen) of Florijs van Boschuijsen. All associated costs should be spread over the community members, or at least the majority of them. |  |
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1495.06.30 | Verdict in a dispute Hughe Hugenzoon van Zwieten, on behalf of Rijnland, and Dirc van Bosche, schout, concerning certain penninggeld |  |
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1525.09.14 | Settlement of a dispute between the achterdorpen that drain into the IJssel and the commons of Rijnland over payment of levies and apportionment of maintenance responsibilities (verhoefslagen). |  |
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1528.10.22 | Settlement of dispute between Waddinxveen, Broek, Tuylnesse and Korterakkeren vs. Coenencoop over building of windmills and horse mills in Coenencoop. |  |
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1529.06.02 | Settlement of dispute, that made its way to the Court of Holland, between the rentmeester of Rijnland and the village officials of Hazerswoude concerning maintenance requirement and monetary assessments assigned to Hazerswoude. |  |
|
|
Keyword 
|
|
|
| ditches
|
|
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1437.06.25 | Procedures for getting neighbors to cooperate in keeping ditches in good order. |  |
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1438.05.06 | General rule on keeping all ditches and canals clean. |  |
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1439.07.06 | Order construction of a waterway (the Zandsloot) at Katwijk |  |
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1439.07.06 | Procedures: the Zandsloot in Katwijk to be inspected in the customary manner. |  |
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1439.07.06 | Compensation ordered to those whose land is dug up for the Zandsloot in Katwijk according to the rates established by the heemraden. |  |
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1440.04.01 | Permission for Zegwaard and Zoetermeer to use a ditch as long as its kade is maintained at two spades high. |  |
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1440.06.28 | Extended the jurisdiction that Koudekerk had from 50 to 100 roeden or more as needed along certain ditches. |  |
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1443.05.19 | Order digging of a ditch of 8 feet along the Voorhout side of the Zwiet, subject to inspection. |  |
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1447.00.00 | Order the Kerksloot near Haarlem to be restored to one roede wide and as deep as is thought necessary. |  |
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1448.05.06 | The earlier keur to clean all ditches for a length of 50 roeden applies only to those directly connected to the ditches involved until some other regulation is provided. |  |
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1450.06.30 | Schout, kroosheemraden, and community of Benthuizen ask heemraden of Rijnland to settle a question concerning the keeping of a nootweg (access road for agricultural purposes) and a ditch. Schout Jan van Heemstede, village lord, gave permission for it in the past, but now much of the land near it has disappeared and the nootweg may be next. Some want to keep it, the ditch, and an 8-foot buffer because they still keep dwellings there. |  |
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1454.02.26 | Permission for Gerrit Hugenszoon to dig a ditch through the seven morgens of land he holds within Benthuizen; the ditch to be wide enough for an aelmen (a flat-bottomed boat) to sail through and a footbridge to cross it. |  |
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1480.05.09 | Permission for kerkmeesters of Hillegom to dig a ditch 6 feet with through their land that lies along the lake. |  |
|
|
Keyword 
|
|
|
| droen
|
|
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1416.01.09 | Verdict in a dispute concening aardhaling and aardgeld in Sparenwoude between Rijnland and the heirs of Vrank van Zanen who own the land (and thus are also responsible for the obligations associated with it). |  |
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1421.01.08 | Verdict in a dispute concening aardhaling and aardgeld in Sparenwoude between Rijnland and the heirs of Vrank van Zanen who own the land (and thus are also responsible for the obligations associated with it). |  |
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1426.09.26 | Verdict in a dispute concening aardhaling and aardgeld in Sparenwoude between Rijnland and the heirs of Vrank van Zanen who own the land (and thus are also responsible for the obligations associated with it). |  |
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1437.00.00 | Verdict in a dispute concening aardhaling and aardgeld in Sparenwoude between Rijnland and the heirs of Vrank van Zanen who own the land (and thus are also responsible for the obligations associated with it). |  |
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1437.00.00 | Verdict in a dispute concening aardhaling and aardgeld in Sparenwoude between Rijnland and the heirs of Vrank van Zanen who own the land (and thus are also responsible for the obligations associated with it). |  |
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1437.06.21 | Verdict in a dispute concening aardhaling and aardgeld in Sparenwoude between Rijnland and the heirs of Vrank van Zanen who own the land (and thus are also responsible for the obligations associated with it). |  |
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1438.07.01 | Verdict in a dispute concening aardhaling and aardgeld in Sparenwoude between Rijnland and the heirs of Vrank van Zanen who own the land (and thus are also responsible for the obligations associated with it). |  |
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1438.ca | Verdict in a dispute concening aardhaling and aardgeld in Sparenwoude between Rijnland and the heirs of Vrank van Zanen who own the land (and thus are also responsible for the obligations associated with it). |  |
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1443.05.19 | Specifications for reconstruction of a road or dike called the Wagenweg with dirt to be taken from the Droen. |  |
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1447.00.00 | Verdict in a dispute concening aardhaling and aardgeld in Sparenwoude between Rijnland and the heirs of Vrank van Zanen who own the land (and thus are also responsible for the obligations associated with it). |  |