Home <— Rijnland 1250-1550

 

Hoogheemraadschap Rijnland
OAR 11, 12, 13 : 1253 - 1564
previous Keyword summaries View: Keywords
Starting with F ...
next Keyword summaries

 

 

false accusations 2 Keyword Summaries 1452 1484
fences 5 Keyword Summaries 1444 1472
fire in boats 1 Keyword Summaries 1484
fish corves 5 Keyword Summaries 1447 1456
fishing 13 Keyword Summaries 1286 1454
flax 3 Keyword Summaries 1435 1453
floertgen 1 Keyword Summaries 1447
flooding 35 Keyword Summaries 1405 1525
florijs aelbrechtszoon 2 Keyword Summaries 1401 1457
florijs bol, bode van haarlem 1 Keyword Summaries 1433
florijs claeszoonskinder 1 Keyword Summaries 1426
florijs gerijtszoon 1 Keyword Summaries 1371
florijs gherijtszoon 2 Keyword Summaries 1457 1457
florijs janszoon 1 Keyword Summaries 1434
florijs paedze 30 Keyword Summaries 1430 1444
florijs van alcmade 2 Keyword Summaries 1453 1453
florijs wael 1 Keyword Summaries 1449
floris v, count 5 Keyword Summaries 1284 1446
footbridge 1 Keyword Summaries 1445
foreest, harper van 2 Keyword Summaries 1417 1430
foreest, jan van 4 Keyword Summaries 1392 1408
foreest, willem van 1 Keyword Summaries 1466
frans adriaenszoon 3 Keyword Summaries 1528 1564
fugitives 8 Keyword Summaries 1431 1447

 

   Keyword  Next
false accusations
DateSummaryRec details
1452.10.02From now on, anyone who charges someone else falsely before the hoogheemraad shall pay all costs.
 
DateSummaryRec details
1484.02.24Those summoning witnesses for matters before the heemraad must pay witnesses' expenses when they lose their cases.
 

 

Prev  Keyword  Next
fences
DateSummaryRec details
1444.10.10Outline the duties or obligations of the schout and heemraden of Leiderdorp
 
DateSummaryRec details
1446.02.22Commend Jan van Haarlem, shout of Spaarndam, for repairing (repairing the shoring, adding dirt and fencing it off) the piece of dike between the Kolksluis (Grotesluis) and his dwelling, at his own cost, but he is not to do any further building on the site.
 
DateSummaryRec details
1454.10.15Permission for Hazerswoude to put fences on the Slingerkade, which ran between Zuid-Waddinxveen and Moordrecht..
 
DateSummaryRec details
1455.07.01Verdict in a long-running dispute between Willem van Oestgeest and his companions and the officials of Oegstgeest concerning morgengeld, penninggeld, and more; the hoogheemraden side with the officials of Oegstgeest.
 
DateSummaryRec details
1472.05.05Permission for Katwijk aan de Rijn to put a fence on the road in Zevenhuizen, in the bend near Luttickgeest. The fence must be made so it can be opened and closed but remain unlocked.
 

 

Prev  Keyword  Next
fire in boats
DateSummaryRec details
1484.02.24Regulations for ships in vicinity of Spaarndam: anchor at least 16 rods distant; no fires on ships.
 

 

Prev  Keyword  Next
fish corves
DateSummaryRec details
1447.05.02The dijkgraaf had accused Willem Kuser of Boshuizen for fishing with eel traps in Rijnland. The latter claimed he did so just as the rentmeester of Noordholland did, referring to old customs. Further he claimed that he should be judged by an offical of the Court of Holland, not of the Hoogheemraadschap. After looking into the matter, the hoogheemraaden claimed jurisdiction and decided that the dijkgraaf should proceed according to old charters.
 
DateSummaryRec details
1454.10.08Because all of Rijnland drains via the Spaarne and the Spaarndam and boats and fish corves attached to bridges hinder water flow, henceforth it is forbidden to moor boats or attach fish corves to to the middle three spans of the Visbrug and the middle five spans of the Langebrug near the Rozenprieel.
 
DateSummaryRec details
1454.10.08Order that the width of passage in the Spaarne be maintained throughout as measured in the five spans of the Langebrug. Within this profile, no boats may be moored on pilings and such nor may fish corves be installed.
 
DateSummaryRec details
1456.02.24In Haarlem, along the Spaarne, the insertion of fish corves or traps and the mooring of boats in the 3 middle spans of the Visbrug or the 5 middle spans of the Langebrug (near Rozenprieel) are prohibited.
 
DateSummaryRec details
1456.05.04Prohibit placement of fish corves or traps and mooring of boats between the main gaps in the bridges in the Spaarne at Haarlem.
 

 

Prev  Keyword  Next
fishing
DateSummaryRec details
1286.02.18Copy of an original charter issued by Count Floris V confirming that the residents of the territory of Rijnland may construct and maintain a dam in the Spaarne, to be inspected annually by the dijkgraaf (the count's bailiff) and the heemraden and control fishing in the sluices. Further, the heemraden shall name their own replacements and the count shall confirm them by taking an oath of office within six weeks.
 
DateSummaryRec details
1310.12.27Copy (partially unreadable) of an original document issued by Count Willem III as arbiter in a dispute between Hendrik, burggraaf of Leiden and the heemraden of Rijnland concerding the fishery in the Wendeldijk; after payment of 400 lb. Hollands to the burggraaf, the right to fish there or anywhere else in Rijnland's territory now belongs exclusively to the heemraden, except for the fisheries of the Zijlbrug and Marebrug.
 
DateSummaryRec details
1356.04.18Copy of a charter of 1356 issued by Count Willem V that authorized construction of and established maintenance responsibilities for the Gouwesluis at Alphen.
 
DateSummaryRec details
1399.03.16Prohibition: no fishing nets to be set (touw setten) in front of sluices from Haarlem to Gouda (thus all of Rijnland) with the exception of the Mare and Zijl bridges at Leiden.
 
DateSummaryRec details
1430.01.07Authorization for Spaarnwoude to build a sluis with associated canal through the dike (Hoge Zeedijk or Spaarndammerdijk) at Hofambacht with various stipulations, including a ban on fishing and a requirement that it be used only to discharge water and not to allow it in from outside.
 
DateSummaryRec details
1438.02.25Order everyone to remove all fishing apparatus and other equipment from the Oude Rijn within 14 days.
 
DateSummaryRec details
1439.06.24Proclaim in all churches: no fishing paraphernalia may be set in any waterways according to the the evidence from the charters and keuren regarding the Oude Rijn.
 
DateSummaryRec details
1441.06.27Allows Dirc van Zwieten to fish on the Noord Aa, but not the Zwiet.
 
DateSummaryRec details
1444.02.24Regulate fishing in the Spaarndam sluices.
 
DateSummaryRec details
1447.05.02The dijkgraaf had accused Willem Kuser of Boshuizen for fishing with eel traps in Rijnland. The latter claimed he did so just as the rentmeester of Noordholland did, referring to old customs. Further he claimed that he should be judged by an offical of the Court of Holland, not of the Hoogheemraadschap. After looking into the matter, the hoogheemraaden claimed jurisdiction and decided that the dijkgraaf should proceed according to old charters.
 
DateSummaryRec details
1447.05.02The dijkgraaf had accused Willem Kuser of Boshuizen for fishing with eel traps in Rijnland. The latter claimed he did so just as the rentmeester of Noordholland did, referring to old customs. Further he claimed that he should be judged by an offical of the Court of Holland, not of the Hoogheemraadschap. After looking into the matter, the hoogheemraaden claimed jurisdiction and decided that the dijkgraaf should proceed according to old charters.
 
DateSummaryRec details
1454.10.08Because all of Rijnland drains via the Spaarne and the Spaarndam and boats and fish corves attached to bridges hinder water flow, henceforth it is forbidden to moor boats or attach fish corves to to the middle three spans of the Visbrug and the middle five spans of the Langebrug near the Rozenprieel.
 
DateSummaryRec details
1454.10.08Order that the width of passage in the Spaarne be maintained throughout as measured in the five spans of the Langebrug. Within this profile, no boats may be moored on pilings and such nor may fish corves be installed.
 

 

Prev  Keyword  Next
flax
DateSummaryRec details
1435.00.00Prohibition against rotting (reten) of flax or hemp in Oude Rijn or any of its wijken (inlets or coves) between the Rijn dike and the road along the south side of the Oude Rijn.
 
DateSummaryRec details
1435.00.00An addendum to another keur stipulating how and where flax and hemp may be rotted along the Oude Rijn trajectory
 
DateSummaryRec details
1453.06.26Replaces older keuren of 1435 (OAR11, 35v-d and 35v-e) by tightening restrictions on rotting flax or hemp in the Oude Rijn.
 

 

Prev  Keyword  Next
floertgen
DateSummaryRec details
1447.00.00Forbid the removal of the road near Floertgen along Zoetermeer lake.
 

 

Prev  Keyword  Next
flooding
DateSummaryRec details
1405.09.29Copy (badly damaged) of a charter issued by Margaret of Cleves [Margaretha van Kleef] in which the ambachten of Sloten, Polanen and Osdorp, along with all ambachten between Amsterdam and the Spaarndam responsible for maintenance of the Spaarndammerdijk, must obey the keur calling for the common repair of dike breaks and prevent the formation of walen (deep washouts).
 
DateSummaryRec details
1405.10.05Copy of an original charter issued by Duke Willem VI authorizing the bailiff (dijkgraaf) and heemraden of Rijnland to order all responsible for dike maintenance between Amsterdam and the Spaarndam to repair dike breaks to prevent the formation of walen along the Spaarndammerdijk
 
DateSummaryRec details
1422.00.00Dijkgraaf and heemraden have inspected the damage to and suffering of the good people of Rijnland with respect to their hydraulic works because of warfare (especially south of the Rijn and along the Goude) and they now appoint special lower heemraden in the named ambachten to oversee the reconstruction and to issue keuren, orders, and commands to that effect as necessary.
 
DateSummaryRec details
1423.04.13Ordered the village of Aalsmeer to send 100 men with the necessary boats and equipment (including hosen, graven, and forken) to close the dike breach at Spaarnwoude and bring the dike up to such strength as to prevent future flooding. They are ordered to appear on the next Sunday evening (19 April) or Monday morning (April 20) before sunrise at the breach with all their tools and equipment.
 
DateSummaryRec details
1426.00.00Testimony taken in inquest done at Lisse into the matter of water being allowed to drain into Rijnland because several had dug through a dune at the request of the houtvesters -- possibly to relieve flooding.
 
DateSummaryRec details
1430.01.13Concerning the reconstruction of the Kerkendijk at Spaarnwoude. Had previously asked if anyone was willing to take on the task for a good financial reward., but no one came forward. Now, Jan Allertszoon, priest and vice curate at Spaarnwoude, with some friends, will take up the task of restoring a section of 15 roeden and 1 foot, for which the hoogheemraden agree to pay 7 nobels per roede. After thinking about it for 14 days and both secretly and publically trying to find others who might do it for less, the hoogheemraden now have agreed. Priest Jan and associates will rebuild the dike to proper specifications. The city of Haarlem offered advice and consent in this matter.
 
DateSummaryRec details
1433.00.00An investigation into a dispute between Rijnland and the city of Amsterdam whose merchants had breached the Overtoom (an overtocht or inclined plane with winch to lift a boat over a dike) in the Kostverloren wetering on the southwestern side of the city to facilitate the transport of some bags of wool. Both sides claimed to own the dike in question and each appealed to old charters granting them jurisdiction. In the end, the arbitrators sided with Rijnland.
 
DateSummaryRec details
1440.04.01Order the construction/reconstruction of the embankment between Zoeterwoude and the Zoetermeer.
 
DateSummaryRec details
1443.03.13Order Zoeterwoude and Voorschoten to repair the dike breach at Stompwijk (presumably along the Zoetermeer).
 
DateSummaryRec details
1444.02.24Forgive some of the penninggeld due from Riedwijk and Nieuwerkerk because of the losses they have suffered from flooding by the lakes [Haarlemmermeer].
 
DateSummaryRec details
1447.06.27Verdict in the matter of Jan Boem, procurator of the Commanderij van Sint-Jan, in a dispute with the heemraden of Hogeveen concerning land they both claim. In the end, the hoogheemraden sided with Hogeveen.
 
DateSummaryRec details
1452.11.21Hoogheemraden agree to summon witnesses to a hearing (dagvaarden) at Haarlem on 15 January 1453 to collect information and issue orders concerning how the breaches in the dike between Spaarndam and Amsterdam are to be closed.
 
DateSummaryRec details
1452.11.24Because there were more breaches in the dikes near the Carthusian monastery and on the east side of the city, the hoogheemraden believed it necessary for those having authority for hydraulic mattes there to join Rijnland in common cause to close the breaches. Therefore they requested that the dijkgraaf of Rijnland, Aelbrecht van Raephorst, with the aldermen (schepenen) of Diemen and the schout and of Amstelveen (collectively the predecessors to Amstelland water board) to attend a hearing planned for 15 January 1453 at Haarlem.
 
DateSummaryRec details
1453.01.15At a hearing at Haarlem on Monday, 15 January, the hoogheemraden ordered the closing of all dike breaches, both east and west of Amsterdam, as soon as possible, all at the same time, to be coordinated with the trustees of the water board Amstelland. An appended note said the work was to begin on the following Sunday
 
DateSummaryRec details
1453.01.15In the presence of the representatives of the villages between Amsterdam and Spaarndam, the hoogheemraden ordered the closing of all dikes along the Spaarndammerdijk, with the costs to be spread over the affected villages in proportion to their areas.
 
DateSummaryRec details
1453.01.15Residents of all villages along the Spaarndammerdijk, between Spaarndam and Amsterdam, must appear at the dike on 8 February to have their prescribed maintenance work in closing the dike breaks assigned to them.
 
DateSummaryRec details
1453.01.15Permission to the Carthusians of Amsterdam to close a breach in the dike near their monastery with dirt from their own lands without help from others. By agreement of the ambachten, the Carthusians are exempt this time from having to contribute to dike work elsewhere. No legal precedent (recht) will be established in this decision.
 
DateSummaryRec details
1453.01.15Permission for Spaarnwoude, Hofambacht, and Houtrijk, because of their remote location and difficulty for others to get there, to close the waal at Houtrijk by themselves, without the others usually responsible for maintenance there. Sloten and Osdorp allowed the same for walen in their territories. They must not stop work until it is competed. Because it will be difficult for the poor to meet their obligations, the hoogheemraden have generously give 70 gulden (of 10 plaken-worth), half to go to Spaarnwoude, Hofambacht, and Houtrijk, and half to Sloten and Osdorp.
 
DateSummaryRec details
1453.01.15Hoogheemraden decide that Willem van Alcmade and Jan van Poelgeest will keep an accounting of all the expenses incurred in the repair and reconstruction of the Zeedijk. Later, these costs will be spread proportionally over all of Rijnland.
 
DateSummaryRec details
1456.04.06Permission for Zoeterwoude to construct a dam in the canal that the residents of Stompwijk had made from the Brede weer on the Ommedijk because the residents of Zoeterwoude have suffered from too much water coming through the canal.
 
DateSummaryRec details
1456.05.04Permission to keep the bridge in front of the Rijnsburgerpoort (Leiden) open. The regulars of (Maridn)poel and the brothers of St. Hieronymous (Lospen, Leiden) and others who live there may maintain the drain (verlaet) at their own cost on condition that they keep it closed whenever the water in the Oude Rijn is higher than the binnenwater so that no land gets flooded.
 
DateSummaryRec details
1457.05.03Order the rerouting and repair of the Heerweg near the church in Nieuwerkerk because of destruction by water of the lakes.
 
DateSummaryRec details
1457.05.03Order rerouting and repair of the road (Heerweg) near the church in Nieuwerkerk because of destruction by water of the lakes.
 
DateSummaryRec details
1457.05.03Order rerouting, repair, and apportionment of maintenance responsibilities (verhoefslagen) of the Heerweg near the church in Nieuwerkerk because of destruction by water of the lakes.
 
DateSummaryRec details
1458.02.28Permission for a dam in a canal, dug by residents of Stompwijk through Zoeterwoude, to be removed because of the many damaged by it, with the understanding that those damaged by its removal have the right to seek compensation.
 
DateSummaryRec details
1460.02.26Because of the damage that they can do to low-lying lands, windmills may be established only with the consent of the hoogheemraden, and all windmills already in place must be stopped until approved.
 
DateSummaryRec details
1477.12.29Request that Amsterdam, Diemen, and Weesp consult with Rijnland on possibilities for coordinated action against dike breaks both north and east of Amsterdam.
 
DateSummaryRec details
1477.12.29All residents between Spaarndam and Amsterdam are ordered to appear at their sections of the Zeedijk (Spaarndammerdijk) on 8 January to receive their assignments in dike repair and remain there until dismissed.
 
DateSummaryRec details
1477.12.29Sloten to close waal at Pieter Cillen's wharf, Osdorp to close the waal at Gerijn Bruynen, and Spaarnwoude, Houtrijk, and Hofambacht to close the waal in Houtrijk behind Gogenct. They will do this without help from others because of the difficulty getting there.
 
DateSummaryRec details
1477.12.29To close the walen, one man will appear for every 20 made of land, and every two men with a schuit, and each shall be properly equipped with spades, barrows, etc. as is necessary. The date to appear is 8 January.
 
DateSummaryRec details
1477.12.29Because the hoogheemraden realize that the poor will have greatest difficulty in performing the repair work needed to close all walen, the former will help pay for excessive costs.
 
DateSummaryRec details
1477.12.29All expenses that hoogheemraden incur while closing the walen in the Zeedijk will be distributed across the entire territory of Rijnland.
 
DateSummaryRec details
1478.06.30The hoogheemraden issue a decision concerning compensation for dirt requisitioned for dike maintenance (aardhaling) and acknowledge that value of the land played a role in the amouts set. A list of individuals and amounts of aardgeld paid follows.
 
DateSummaryRec details
1525.09.14Settlement of a dispute between the achterdorpen that drain into the IJssel and the commons of Rijnland over payment of levies and apportionment of maintenance responsibilities (verhoefslagen).
 
DateSummaryRec details
1525.09.14Settlement of a dispute between the achterdorpen that drain into the IJssel and the commons of Rijnland over payment of levies and apportionment of maintenance responsibilities (verhoefslagen).
 

 

Prev  Keyword  Next
florijs aelbrechtszoon
DateSummaryRec details
1401.05.19Settlement of an action taken by the dijkgraaf and hoogheemraden of Rijnland against the schout of Alphen along with heemraden of Alphen, Haszerswoude, and Boskoop for an illegal schouw (inspection) that had done on the Bakwetering in Waddinxveen.
 
DateSummaryRec details
1457.06.28This is the verdict in a dispute between Aven Jan Bonens widow and Florijs Aelbertszoon concerning a verhoefslag (apportionment of maintenance responsibilities) for the dike at Houtrijk.
 

 

Prev  Keyword  Next
florijs bol, bode van haarlem
DateSummaryRec details
1433.00.00An investigation into a dispute between Rijnland and the city of Amsterdam whose merchants had breached the Overtoom (an overtocht or inclined plane with winch to lift a boat over a dike) in the Kostverloren wetering on the southwestern side of the city to facilitate the transport of some bags of wool. Both sides claimed to own the dike in question and each appealed to old charters granting them jurisdiction. In the end, the arbitrators sided with Rijnland.
 

 

Prev  Keyword  Next
florijs claeszoonskinder
DateSummaryRec details
1426.00.00Testimony taken in inquest done at Lisse into the matter of water being allowed to drain into Rijnland because several had dug through a dune at the request of the houtvesters -- possibly to relieve flooding.
 

 

Prev  Keyword  Next
florijs gerijtszoon
DateSummaryRec details
1371.11.13A list of certain incomes attached to lands and buildings perhaps in the neighborhood of Voorschoten and Valkenburg.
 

 

Prev  Keyword  Next
florijs gherijtszoon
DateSummaryRec details
1457.03.17Invitation for contracts with specifications for the rebuilding of the Aalsmeer [Hazerswoude, Sassenheim, and Randenburg] sluice and the Noordwijk [Aarlanderveen, Zegwaard, and Zoetermeer] sluis. The final section, describing how some work was not done to specification on the Aalsmeer sluice may actually date to the required completion, St. Bartholomew's day (25 August). See also next item which seems to approve of the work order for the Noordwijk sluice.
 
DateSummaryRec details
1457.03.17Invitation for contracts with specifications for the rebuilding of the Aalsmeer [Hazerswoude, Sassenheim, and Randenburg] sluice and the Noordwijk [Aarlanderveen, Zegwaard, and Zoetermeer] sluis. The final section, describing how some work was not done to specification on the Aalsmeer sluice may actually date to the required completion, St. Bartholomew's day (25 August). See also next item which seems to approve of the work order for the Noordwijk sluice.
 

 

Prev  Keyword  Next
florijs janszoon
DateSummaryRec details
1434.05.00Testimony in a dispute taken by heemraad Meynert Claeszoon concerning the priest Jan Allertsz. of Spaarnwoude who was charged with using more land for the church than he was authorized to use. In early 1430, priest Jan and associates had agreed to rebuild the badly damaged Kerkendijk at Spaarnwoude.
 

 

Prev  Keyword  Next
florijs paedze
DateSummaryRec details
1430.01.13Concerning the reconstruction of the Kerkendijk at Spaarnwoude. Had previously asked if anyone was willing to take on the task for a good financial reward., but no one came forward. Now, Jan Allertszoon, priest and vice curate at Spaarnwoude, with some friends, will take up the task of restoring a section of 15 roeden and 1 foot, for which the hoogheemraden agree to pay 7 nobels per roede. After thinking about it for 14 days and both secretly and publically trying to find others who might do it for less, the hoogheemraden now have agreed. Priest Jan and associates will rebuild the dike to proper specifications. The city of Haarlem offered advice and consent in this matter.
 
DateSummaryRec details
1431.09.05Part of an on-going regulation of the Kostverloren dike, part of the sea dike at Amsterdam.
 
DateSummaryRec details
1434.02.03The dijkgraaf and heemraden of Rijnland and the Schout of Alphen and the heemraden of the Alphenerwetering (heemraden from Alphen, Boskoop, Hazarswoude, and Waddinxveen) confirm that Florijs van Boschuijsen has permission to restore a canal in Poelien so that the wild peat lands of Waddinxveen can be drained into the Gouwe.
 
DateSummaryRec details
1438.07.01Verdict in a dispute concening aardhaling and aardgeld in Sparenwoude between Rijnland and the heirs of Vrank van Zanen who own the land (and thus are also responsible for the obligations associated with it).
 
DateSummaryRec details
1438.11.15Establish how expenses incurred by heemraden while performing their duties are to be reimbursed; certain associates and guests can also be covered.
 
DateSummaryRec details
1438.caList of heemraden who served as rentmeester from 1432 to 1438, with their backups from 1432-1437
 
DateSummaryRec details
1440.04.01Order the construction/reconstruction of the embankment between Zoeterwoude and the Zoetermeer.
 
DateSummaryRec details
1440.08.31Heemraden arbitrate a dispute between Amsterdam and Sloten about payment of aardgeld.
 
DateSummaryRec details
1440.10.04The stoeling (assessments, assignment of maintenance responsibilities) for Spaarnwoude shall remain as they are as long as they remain outside the territory of Rijnland.
 
DateSummaryRec details
1441.09.12Order the cleanup of the Spaarne between Bamis (1 October) and Omnium Sanctorum (1 November).
 
DateSummaryRec details
1443.02.24Continued artibration of dispute between Claes van Sparenwoude and priest Jan Allertzoon with copies of various related documents.
 
DateSummaryRec details
1443.03.13Order Zoeterwoude and Voorschoten to repair the dike breach at Stompwijk (presumably along the Zoetermeer).
 
DateSummaryRec details
1443.03.13Permission to take hydraulic measures in Stompwijc as long as they cause no damage to Boudwijn van Zwieten.
 
DateSummaryRec details
1443.03.13Declare that the measurements taken at Hazerswoude shall stand as authentic and be recorded in three books.
 
DateSummaryRec details
1443.03.13Regulation of a dispute with Woerden concerning how land is measured and morgengeld is assessed.
 
DateSummaryRec details
1443.05.19Specifications for repair of the Alkemadersluis
 
DateSummaryRec details
1443.05.19Specifications for repair of Aalsmeerdersluis.
 
DateSummaryRec details
1443.05.19Specifications for the reconstruction of the Haarlemmersluis in the Spaarndam.
 
DateSummaryRec details
1443.05.19Specifications for the reconstruction of the Grote Sluis in the Spaarndam.
 
DateSummaryRec details
1443.05.19Specifications for reconstruction of a road or dike called the Wagenweg with dirt to be taken from the Droen.
 
DateSummaryRec details
1443.05.19Specifications for the reconstruction of the ship lock (Kolksluis) in the Spaarndam: haul in dirt; repair shoring.
 
DateSummaryRec details
1443.05.19Order the residents of Noordwijk, Noordwijkerhout, and Voorhout to repair the sluis doors in the Voorhouterwetering in Sassenheim and Warmond.
 
DateSummaryRec details
1443.05.19Order digging of a ditch of 8 feet along the Voorhout side of the Zwiet, subject to inspection.
 
DateSummaryRec details
1443.05.19Specifications for the construction/reconstruction of the new sluice known as the Hogesluis
 
DateSummaryRec details
1443.07.25Regulate the maintenance of Kostverloren dike, part of sea dike at Amsterdam, in the wake of the death of Aernt Vechterszoon. Picked up by Reyner Reynerszoon.
 
DateSummaryRec details
1443.10.01Municipal officials of Haarlem and Leiden complained in front of the governor of Holland, lord of Lalaing, about Rijnland's attempts to collect levies from the cities despite their charters which they claim exempt them from such payments. Rijnland countered with charters claiming such authority and also referred, at the very end, to a similar case with Amsterdam in which, presumably Rijnland's claims were upheld.
 
DateSummaryRec details
1444.02.24Regularize the time and manner of collecting assessments in the ambachten of Rijnland.
 
DateSummaryRec details
1444.03.04Permission for the schout of Leiderdorp to announce and carry out the inspection of the sluices and culverts between the Does bridge and the ambacht of Koudekerk.
 
DateSummaryRec details
1444.03.04Schout of Koudekerk to announce and carry inspection of the sluices and culverts in the Hoge Rijndijk in the same manner as consented to for Leiderdorp.
 
DateSummaryRec details
1444.03.17Specifications for rebuilding of the Alphen sluice in the Spaarndam
 

 

Prev  Keyword  Next
florijs van alcmade
DateSummaryRec details
1453.02.25Written arguments that were part of longer processes involving Daem Janszoon and also Sasbout Aelwijnszoon against Vranc Jacobszoon and Eggert Vranckenszoon concerning levies and dues in Zegwaard.
 
DateSummaryRec details
1453.02.25Written arguments that were part of longer processes involving Daem Janszoon and also Sasbout Aelwijnszoon against Vranc Jacobszoon and Eggert Vranckenszoon concerning levies and dues in Zegwaard.
 

 

Prev  Keyword  Next
florijs wael
DateSummaryRec details
1449.06.05Permission to put a sluice [zijl] through the Spaarndammerdijk between Florijs[van Sparenwoude]waal and Mijchielswaal.
 

 

Prev  Keyword  Next
floris v, count
DateSummaryRec details
1284.11.13Grant Alphen, Randenburg, Snijdelwijk; Groesnwaard, Splinters Ambacht uten Waard the right to remove the sluice gate in the Gouwesluis at the Oude Rijn in Alphen as well as other rights associated with the Gouwe.
 
DateSummaryRec details
1286.02.18Copy of an original charter issued by Count Floris V confirming that the residents of the territory of Rijnland may construct and maintain a dam in the Spaarne, to be inspected annually by the dijkgraaf (the count's bailiff) and the heemraden and control fishing in the sluices. Further, the heemraden shall name their own replacements and the count shall confirm them by taking an oath of office within six weeks.
 
DateSummaryRec details
1437.00.00Oath of office for the hoogheemraden of Rijnland.
 
DateSummaryRec details
1443.10.01Municipal officials of Haarlem and Leiden complained in front of the governor of Holland, lord of Lalaing, about Rijnland's attempts to collect levies from the cities despite their charters which they claim exempt them from such payments. Rijnland countered with charters claiming such authority and also referred, at the very end, to a similar case with Amsterdam in which, presumably Rijnland's claims were upheld.
 
DateSummaryRec details
1446.06.28Take testimony in a dispute between the residents of Alphen and those of Randenburg, Groenswaard, and Snijdelwijk concerning maintenance requirements in the Gouwesluis at Alphen, with a copy of an old charter from 1284 brought into play
 

 

Prev  Keyword  Next
footbridge
DateSummaryRec details
1445.10.05Permission for Zoeterwoude and Benthuizen to renew a footbridge (kwakelbrug) on the condition that it be the same as the original.
 

 

Prev  Keyword  Next
foreest, harper van
DateSummaryRec details
1417.caList of those in Heemstede who were delinquent in paying their morgengeld.
 
DateSummaryRec details
1430.01.13Concerning the reconstruction of the Kerkendijk at Spaarnwoude. Had previously asked if anyone was willing to take on the task for a good financial reward., but no one came forward. Now, Jan Allertszoon, priest and vice curate at Spaarnwoude, with some friends, will take up the task of restoring a section of 15 roeden and 1 foot, for which the hoogheemraden agree to pay 7 nobels per roede. After thinking about it for 14 days and both secretly and publically trying to find others who might do it for less, the hoogheemraden now have agreed. Priest Jan and associates will rebuild the dike to proper specifications. The city of Haarlem offered advice and consent in this matter.
 

 

Prev  Keyword  Next
foreest, jan van
DateSummaryRec details
1392.07.11Limits on peat digging: dig no more than two days worth of peat on either the west or east side of the road between Riedwijker Nuwenwech and Kercklaen; no digging within 40 roeden of the Haarlemmermeer; no transport of peat outside the ambacht of Nieuwerkerk.
 
DateSummaryRec details
1399.03.16Prohibition: no fishing nets to be set (touw setten) in front of sluices from Haarlem to Gouda (thus all of Rijnland) with the exception of the Mare and Zijl bridges at Leiden.
 
DateSummaryRec details
1405.11.11Requirement of cooperation: everyone along the Hoge Zeedijk from Amsterdam to Spaarndam must help each other when any of them suffer a dike break and do so according to the requirements spelled out in specific orders.
 
DateSummaryRec details
1408.06.11Arbitration of a dispute that Noordwijk, Noordwijkerhout, and Voorhout had with Lisse concerning a canal named the Delft.
 

 

Prev  Keyword  Next
foreest, willem van
DateSummaryRec details
1466.05.06Permission for Willem van Foreest to schouw (inspect and maintain) his ambacht of Middelburg with his schout in May and again at Bamis (October 1).
 

 

Prev  Keyword  Next
frans adriaenszoon
DateSummaryRec details
1528.10.22Settlement of dispute between Waddinxveen, Broek, Tuylnesse and Korterakkeren vs. Coenencoop over building of windmills and horse mills in Coenencoop.
 
DateSummaryRec details
1533.03.14Schout and villagers of Alphen farm out the Goudkade and Binnekade to Jacob Janssoen Moel and his heirs.
 
DateSummaryRec details
1564.01.25Schout and villagers of Alphen farm out Goudkade and Binnenkade.
 

 

Prev  Keyword   
fugitives
DateSummaryRec details
1431.00.00List of individuals banished in 1431
 
DateSummaryRec details
1432.00.00Allow recovery of money owed on some land in Zoetermeer belonging to the widow and children of the late Aelbrecht die Mandemaker who have abandoned the land and/or are fugitives. Meynert Dirc Smeetszoon agreed to pay the sum owed and will recover his cost from the property owned by the fugitives.
 
DateSummaryRec details
1437.00.00Verdict in a dispute concening aardhaling and aardgeld in Sparenwoude between Rijnland and the heirs of Vrank van Zanen who own the land (and thus are also responsible for the obligations associated with it).
 
DateSummaryRec details
1437.00.00Verdict in a dispute concening aardhaling and aardgeld in Sparenwoude between Rijnland and the heirs of Vrank van Zanen who own the land (and thus are also responsible for the obligations associated with it).
 
DateSummaryRec details
1437.02.01The widow of Meynert Dircszonn, Aechte, agrees to assume responsibility for land and attendant hydraulic requirements of Lijsbet Jans dochter, who abandoned her land and has fled the area.
 
DateSummaryRec details
1437.06.21Verdict in a dispute concening aardhaling and aardgeld in Sparenwoude between Rijnland and the heirs of Vrank van Zanen who own the land (and thus are also responsible for the obligations associated with it).
 
DateSummaryRec details
1438.caVerdict in a dispute concening aardhaling and aardgeld in Sparenwoude between Rijnland and the heirs of Vrank van Zanen who own the land (and thus are also responsible for the obligations associated with it).
 
DateSummaryRec details
1447.00.00Verdict in a dispute concening aardhaling and aardgeld in Sparenwoude between Rijnland and the heirs of Vrank van Zanen who own the land (and thus are also responsible for the obligations associated with it).
 

 

 

AuthorPublicationHome
William H. TeBrake
Maine, USA, June 2006
Rijnland
OAR11, OAR12, OAR13
www.janvanhout.nl